Thursday, February 16, 2012

Overrated...YES!
Yes, America did overreact to 9/11! First, after 9/11 hundreds of Arabic or anyone who looked of the Arabic or Muslim dissent were stopped in the airport and went through extra security screenings. Which is extremely racist and not the proper way to selectee someone for extra screening. America also, overreacted because the government was continently changing the countries terrorist attack leave. It would go from orange to red then drop back down to orange. By Zytech Engineering LLC making safe-rooms was a complete overreaction. It just scared Americans even more. Then there was John Rivers chute escape. This appeared to be a little difficult to put on. If someone is in a moment of panic they are going to have a hard time putting it on. To me America did overreact.        
            Prior to 9/11 airport security was not as accurate as they are now. Before 9/11 there was not a 3oz limit on liquids, gels or aerosols. There were also no full body scanners. There were just metal detectors and scanners that bags went through. Before 9/11 aircrafts were allowed to be unattended when their doors were opening, but now someone has to be at the aircraft at all times when the door is open. Now cockpit doors are always locked as before they were open for kids to go meet the pilot. Since 9/11 airports have hired 55,000 TSA officers.      
            I think America tried their best to keep America safe after 9/11.  Airport security has increased greatly since the terrorist attacks. They now have full body scanners. Also, passengers are not allowed to bring liquids, gels or aerosols over 3oz pass the TSA checkpoints. They only allow certain thing such a breast milk and medicine, but this still has to get scanned and approved by a TSA officer.  I myself as a Boston Logan International Airport employee know this first hand. Some of my co-worker who has been there for more than twenty- six years tells me how TSA has improved post 9/11. For passengers it is not easy to get through security with items that they are not supposed to have. At the same time TSA is not always paying as much attention as they should. Passengers still get through security with items they should have a liquors that are over 3oz. But if you work at the airport and have a S.I.D.A badge (secure identification display area) it is extremely easy to bring dangerous goods (flammables, explosives, and toxins ect.) to the sterile area or generally speaking on the tarmac. So if the terrorist really wanted to attack again they can easy get someone to work at the airport for them. To work at the airport they are certain trainings you need to take, but once you take those test you basically know secrets of the airport.



























September 11, 2001

Federal authorities have known for years that suspected terrorists with ties to bin Laden were receiving flight training at schools in the US and abroad. One convicted terrorist confessed that his planned role in a terror attack was to crash a plane into CIA headquarters.
-Washington Post 9/23/01
Summer 2000: A secret military operation named Able Danger identifies four future 9/11 hijackers, including lead hijacker Mohamed Atta, as a potential threat and members of Al Qaeda. Yet none of this is mentioned later in the 9/11 Commissions' final report. When questioned, the 9/11 commission's chief spokesman initially says that staff members briefed about Able Danger did not remember hearing anything about Atta. Days later, however, after provided detailed information, he says the uniformed officer who briefed two staff members had indeed mentioned Atta.
-New York Times 8/11/05
President Bush is warned by US intelligence that Bin Laden might be planning to hijack commercial airliners. The White House waits eight months after 9/11 to reveal this fact.
-CNN 4/11/04

1 comment:

  1. Karina,

    Good post! You start off very strong. Obviously, this is a personal issue for you, since you work at an airport.

    I like the strength in your tone. I see that you listed 3 facts/sources at the bottom of the post. Please use these facts in the body of your text. In that way, I can see how you use such facts in your argument. (So, the facts are actually shown twice in your post.)

    Also, your second paragraph needs an opponent. You discuss your opposing view, but that may confuse the reader. You should always stick to your guns. Who would oppose your thesis? Republicans? Who supports strong security and racial profiling? Find out who and use them.

    I asked that you use a quotation from the article I emailed. In that article, there is someone that you would most likely disagree with. Find what they said and use it in paragraph 2.

    Is this clear?

    Overall, good improvements. Keep adjusting and your scores will keep rising.

    GR: 84

    ReplyDelete